Consent in clinical negligence cases: Montgomery, causation and institutional failures
- Home
- >
- Articles & Publications
- >
- Consent in clinical negligence cases: Montgomery,...
Search
Archive
Filter by
Sign up to mailings
To keep up to date with our latest news and events, please sign up for mailings.
You are always free to unsubscribe at any time.
Barrister: Justin Valentine
Source: St John’s Chambers
Summary: Justin reviews the issues of consent in clinical negligence cases in, and subsequent to, the case of Montgomery. He examines the extension of the Montgomery principle, to advice-giving in general in clinical settings and the renewed focus on causation as it relates to consent in the case of Duce v Worcestershire which suggests that the authority of Chester v Afshar can no longer confidently be relied upon. He provides practical pointers when dealing with consent, the provision of information/advice and, more broadly, institutional failures subsequent to the case of Darnley.