Barlow v Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council [2020] EWCA Civ 696.
- Home
- >
- Recent Cases
- >
- Barlow v Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council...
Search
Sign up to mailings
To keep up to date with our latest news and events, please sign up for mailings.
You are always free to unsubscribe at any time.
Matthew White, of St John’s Chambers’ personal injury team, successfully represented the claimant in Barlow v. Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council [2020] EWCA Civ 696.
The key points are:
- For a highway to be “a highway constructed by a highway authority” so as to be considered highway maintainable at public expense,
- the highway must be constructed by an authority exercising its highway authority functions (i.e. this Court of Appeal has disagreed with Sedley LJ in Gulliksen); and
- the highway must have been constructed by the highway authority after 1959.
- If a claimant is permitted to be on the defendant’s land for reasons other than the existence of a highway, it has been suggested (obiter) that the rule in Gautret v. Egerton/ McGeown v. Northern Ireland Housing Executive which would mean that no duty of care is owed in relation to accidents on the highway does not apply.